Hillary Clinton Remarks on Alt.Right - Reno, Nevada - Decoded, Part One

Remarks of Hillary Clinton, in bold, are decoded below.

This week we proposed new steps to cut red tape and taxes, and make it easier for small businesses to get the credit they need to grow and hire.

Decoded Response: Trump would do four significant things to boost small businesses, (1) lower taxes (2) less paperwork to comply with federal regulations (3) state-based flexible minimum wage rather than mandatory $15 per hour Clinton proposal (4) abolish ObamaCare and make insurance nationally competitive, getting small business out of tax-collecting role. Hence, her ideas are borrowed from Trump yet . . .

Clinton's astounding coziness with Big Money, Big Businesses, Big Pharma, and Big Government leaves one exceedingly skeptical that she will “go small” rather than go big. This becomes clear further on.

Because I believe that in America, if you can dream it, you should be able to build it.

Decoded Response: Taken directly from Trump, who had been saying he supports the dreams of all Americans, especially youth. His theme has been, for years, “Think big and you will achieve big.”

Everywhere I go, people tell me how concerned they are by the divisive rhetoric coming from my opponent in this election.

From the start, Donald Trump has built his campaign on prejudice and paranoia.

He’s taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over one of America’s two major political parties.

Decoded Response: “From the start” Hillary has been, along with Mainstream Propaganda Media, espousing this unified theme about Trump. In numerous speeches she has applied techniques to convey rather simple terms regarding Trump. These are (1) That Trump should not be taken seriously as a candidate; (2) That Trump is “dangerous;” (3) that Trump is racist; (4) that Trump is to be feared; (5) that Trump “incites violence.” 

The MPM, Mainstream Propaganda Media, has been goosestepping right along with Hillary on each of these themes. There is a reason that I use that word, “goosestepping.” Those who have studied in great detail the Rise of the German Third Reich, as I have, understand the essential weapon of propaganda that made it possible for the National Socialists to rise to power. Hitler was, as Hillary hopes to be, elected to office.

It is extremely unlikely that people tell Hillary that they are “concerned ... by the divisive rhetoric” coming from Trump. “Divisive rhetoric” is a term used only by the MPM, “as if it is true” (I'll have to do a later piece on the uses of “as if it is true” and “as if it is not true) that you, our audience (victims of our NLP programming) should be thinking about this. This is to say, from the start of Trump's campaign the MPM began to use specific adjectives and adverbs to describe Trump in terms that have preprogrammed negative effects. These terms include, and are definitely not limited to, "damaging," "offensive," “divisive,” “paranoid,” “racist,” “violence,” “hate,” “white,” “extreme,” “uneducated,” “male,” “misogynist,” “fringe,” “rural,” “radical,” and “backwoods.” Other words frequently used include "privilege," “gun-owners,” “anger,” “reactionary” “extremist,” “dangerous,” “right-wing,” “anti,” “loyal,” “conservative,” “Christian,” “prejudice,” “discrimination,” “phobia,” “bias,” and of course “fear.”

Every one of these words is used by both Clinton and the MPM because, after decades of careful application and redefinition, a predictable negative response occurs in a majority of Americans. Throughout this and future blog posts I will explain the hidden meaning of these terms as they are used.

It's a simple game of word association.

His disregard for the values that make our country great is profoundly dangerous.

Decoded Response: The adjective “dangerous” was used by a consortium of about fifty (50) U.S. Military or “national security” careerists from various agencies, including the Pentagon, who at once said they could not support Trump. When that announcement was made in various MPM venues, it was given a good bit of noise. It was given much attention strategically because it pertained to Trump, and that these careerists considered Trump “dangerous” for his lack of experience, or whatever uncertainty he represents. It was a “top story” for a short time.

Timing, in politics, is often "everything."

At that same time  another story came out, extremely “on the DL,” that the Pentagon and other bastions of “national security” had been unable to account for Six & One Half Trillion Federal Reserve Notes - $6.5 Trillion - (or the credit equivalent). During a significant portion of the period during which this money vanished, or became untraceable, Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. Trillions go missing: Taxpayer cash

This adds another meaning to the term “profoundly dangerous.”

We know for absolute certainty that Hillary will never order an investigation into that 6.5 trillion dollars that is unaccounted for. That would never happen.

Freebeacon.com: National security, State Department misplaced $6 billion under Hillary Clinton

We can suppose with equal certainty that Trump might take a look at that and do at least a preliminary investigation. There is definitely that chance. He would be, I suppose, about thirty times more likely to take some steps to find out where the hemorrhages of money are happening, even if only for future safeguards of "running this country more like a business." 

For those responsible for the unaccountability of trillions, Trump would be indeed “profoundly dangerous,” but only to those in power who have abused their public trust. 

And by the way, “values” is another term with hidden meaning. For those inclined to vote, and live, “to the left of center,” it means progressive values, and only progressive values.

In just the past week, under the guise of “outreach” to African Americans, Trump has stood up in front of largely white audiences and described black communities in insulting and ignorant terms:

“Poverty. Rejection. Horrible education. No housing. No homes. No ownership. Crime at levels nobody has seen… Right now, you walk down the street, you get shot.”

Those are his words.

Donald Trump misses so much.

Decoded Response: There are very many White and Hispanic people living in or visiting Miami-Dade County right now who know that Trump is right. We are advised not to go to certain places in the City of Miami, especially at night. Hillary attacks Trump as though places like Liberty City do not exist. But Liberty City does exist, and it is impoverished. But there are many other cities where poverty, poor schools, inadequate housing, low homeownership rates are far worse. The majority of bad neighborhoods are populated by Blacks. They know it, and increasing violence all around this country demonstrates that they are not happy about it.

What Hillary misses is that a large number, a growing percentage, of Blacks are waking up. They are on to Hillary and the failed Democrat programs that she represents so proudly.

By Spencer Overton:

Among boys and men ages 15-34, for example, African Americans are over 20 times more likely than whites to be victims of gun homicide.

80 percent of African Americans described gun violence in America as an extremely serious problem.

And that many of those at high risk to commit or to be victimized by gun violence face a lack of job skills and opportunities, addiction, and other challenges.

Over 92 percent of African Americans and over 88 percent of Latinos support solutions like job training, life skills support, and mental health counseling available to young people and people just released from jail or prison.

He doesn’t see the success of black leaders in every field…

Decoded Response: Hillary has no clue what Donald Trump sees and doesn't see. But based on what he says about there being a basic economic root to the problems, Trump is profoundly right.

And he certainly doesn’t have any solutions to take on the reality of systemic racism and create more equity and opportunity in communities of color.

Decoded Response: Again, there are those trigger terms: “systemic,” and “racism.” Another very important trigger word is “equity.” This word, equity, was adopted by Progressives because of its similarity to “equality.” The verbal (NLP) trick is, since we are in this new Age of Diversity, and people have equal rights, a word that actually means justice as it pertains to equal claim becomes an expectation of equal distribution of goods or wealth.

According to Hillary, “systemic racism” is the problem that stands in the way of “more equity” and “more opportunity.” The inferred connection is that since Trump allegedly doesn't have solutions, he is part of that “systemic racism” standing in the way of progress. Of course that's nonsense.

But this introduces a very strange set of facts.

Maurice Milles Mansa on Facebook posted a mind-blowing article about the size of African American economic power: 

AFRICAN AMERICAN GDP 2,226.783 trillion USD. If African Americans were a nation of themselves, they would have the 10th highest GDP in the world.

Decoding this a bit further, we know that a majority of Blacks here live in Democrat controlled cities. And most of their concentrations are urban. They go to urban schools, and shop in urban environments. They also have considerable economic clout.

The problem is exceedingly clear: a national progressive agenda, including the massive teachers unions, control the content and means of education. Throughout our school systems, progressive values prevail. Not only does the progressive agenda prevail, it dominates every aspect of education in America.

This is the exact reason that poverty, low-income, inadequate housing, and other trials and travails of Black Americans are so prevalent. There is sufficient money poured into public schools to compete with other systems around the world. A shortage of money is not the problem. As it's said in computing, “garbage in, garbage out.” It's the content that creates the problem. It's not the “hardware,” or the money, school buildings, equipment or structures that fail. It's the software that fails to nourish students with decent educations, and that software is written by Democrat Progressives.

It takes a lot of nerve to ask people he’s ignored and mistreated for decades, “What do you have to lose?” The answer is everything!

Decoded Response: Again we find another key trigger word, “mistreated.” Hillary has no evidence of Trump mistreating anyone “for decades.” And “ignored;” when you build a business of even half a billion dollars, no one has time for everyone. You have work to do; while one is doing a monumental job with countless responsibilities there is no time for details of lives of millions. On the face, Hillary's statement makes no sense, but going below the surface ...

The essence of what Hillary meant is, “you are victims! You have been ignored,” and some will take this as, “Trump is ignorant.” It follows that Hillary is telling her audience that THEY are Trump's victims, “mistreated” as they have been.

Hillary enjoys telling people they are "victims" because this diminishes their ability to take control of their lives.

Trump’s lack of knowledge or experience or solutions would be bad enough.

Decoded Response: Again, it is right out in front of your face, “Trump is ignorant,” in his “lack of knowledge or experience.” You are instructed to make this assumption as if it is absolutely true. 

But what he’s doing here is more sinister.

Trump is reinforcing harmful stereotypes and offering a dog whistle to his most hateful supporters.

Decoded Response: Hillary wants you to believe Trump is evil because she says so, and she's the expert on evil. (No snickering please.)

She uses a sly word here, “sinister,” implying that Trump is just what she is: a sneaky sort of bad thing with bad intentions. But she wants you to believe that it is Trump who cannot be trusted, of course.

But again, a couple more loaded terms: “most hateful supporters,” and “dog whistle.”

Decoding the first phrase is easy: If YOU support Trump then YOU are obviously hateful. The implication is that “all Trump supporters are hateful” but only some hear his dog whistle: those who are most hateful.

From WikiPedia on political dog whistle:

According to William Safire, the term "dog whistle" in reference to politics may have been derived from its use in the field of opinion polling. Safire quotes Richard Morin, director of polling for The Washington Post, as writing in 1988, "subtle changes in question-wording sometimes produce remarkably different results.... researchers call this the 'Dog Whistle Effect': Respondents hear something in the question that researchers do not", and speculates that campaign workers adapted the phrase from political pollsters.[1]

In her book Voting for Jesus: Christianity and Politics in Australia, academic Amanda Lohrey writes that the goal of the dog-whistle is to appeal to the greatest possible number of electors while alienating the smallest possible number. She uses as an example Australian politicians using broadly appealing words such as "family" and "values", which have extra resonance for Christians, while avoiding overt Christian moralizing that might be a turn-off for non-Christian voters.[2]

During the 2008 Democratic primaries, several writers criticized Hillary Clinton's campaign's reliance on code words and innuendo seemingly designed to frame Barack Obama's race as problematic, saying Obama was characterized by the Clinton campaign and its prominent supporters as anti-white due to his association with Reverend Jeremiah Wright, as able to attract only black votes, as anti-patriotic, a drug user, possibly a drug seller, and married to an angry, ungrateful black woman.[27] Obama was accused of dog-whistling to African-American voters by using a blend of gestures, style and rhetoric, such as fist-bumps and walking with a "swagger — a rhythmic lope that says cool and confident and undeniably black," that carefully affirmed and underscored his black identity.[2

Hillary gets right to the point: She knows exactly what using a “dog whistle” is because she's been doing it in numerous campaigns. It becomes clear that she has been applying the same technique all along in this campaign of 2016. Her present speech is loaded with dog whistles.

Another term for her technique is subliminal manipulation. Or, some prefer the term meta-programming.

Yeah, I know how much Bernie Sanders supporters like meta-programming used on them. As much as they like being doused with Chem-trails and fed GMOs. 

It’s a disturbing preview of what kind of President he’d be.

Decoded Response: This is our preview of what a Hillary Clinton presidency would be: manipulation, lying, disregard for the integrity of human minds, communities suffering from Institutional Miseducation, and a long list begins.

In this one speech, there are too many phrases and insults to decode in one session. Stay tuned for more coming up soon.